patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Liquor Licenses Banned in Crime Hot Spots around Belmont CTA Station

Both police and Lake View officials are coming together to put an end to high crime around the Belmont CTA train station.

 

Entrepreneurs looking to open a new liquor store or bar near the Belmont Avenue CTA train station in Lake View better think twice, because getting a liquor license will be close to impossible.

Ald. Tom Tunney (44th) and the Chicago City Council recently passed a moratorium on liquor licenses on about 10 blocks surrounding the train station. It’s just one thing area officials are doing to tackle crime in the area, according to Tunney’s Director of Community Outreach Erin Duffy.

“It was officially passed on Nov. 15, and it’s on new packaged goods and tavern licenses,” Duffy said. “Taverns are basically bars that don’t sell food, and ‘packaged goods’ has to do with liquor stores. We just don’t need more liquor stores there. 
 It has been a problem area, and we’ve had a lot of issues surrounding liquor. Some of the neighbors in the area have just wanted to see a change on that.”

The specific blocks now included in the moratorium include:

  • Belmont Avenue from Clark Street to Racine Avenue
  • Clark Street from Buckingham Place to Fletcher Avenue
  • Sheffield Avenue from School Street to Barry Avenue

Tunney’s Chief of Staff Bennett Lawson said the ward’s been discouraging liquor in this area now for 10 years. The moratorium will just officiate what they’ve already been pushing.

“For many years we have stood with the community and have fought new liquor stores and taverns in the area,” Tunney said in a statement. “This move solidifies our efforts and will give us more tools moving forward.”


Let Patch save you time. Get more Lake View news like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone with our free newsletter. Join us here!


Six months worth of wiggle room has been given to existing businesses on the streets affected by the new moratorium. Business owners can sell their business, re-apply for the liquor license or expand their business if they file an application within six months without the new rules having any affect.

From that point forward, no other people will be allowed to open a tavern or liquor store in the designated areas.

And while the move is intended to increase safety and reduce crime at the hot spot—found by police to be an active gang territory—some neighbors are worried the new rule might repel business owners looking to set up shop in Lake View, or reduce a storefront’s property value to owners who might want to sell.

Lawson said a new liquor delivery business called Beer Run applied for a license and was declined. Owner Tony Wojo is applying for the license in Bucktown instead.

“Ninety-nine percent of our victims are people who went out drinking. ... if they walk home intoxicated, they make a really good victim.”

“The owner is a nice guy, and we don’t have any issues with them,” Lawson said. “We just have opposed new liquor stores, packaged and tavern, pretty consistently in this area.”

Tunney’s statement says the new rule doesn’t restrict new restaurants from setting up shop in the area, so residents need not worry about that. However, it does “significantly restrict” the transfer of existing liquor-selling businesses to new owners, outside very specific exceptions, like between spouses.

And police are stepping up their game in the area, too. According to Commander Elias Voulgaris, District 19 has the most liquor licenses in all of Chicago. That’s why he’s launching a new “entertainment detail” focused on keeping the peace where people party.

“We’d like to have more arrests and few incidents in general,” Sgt. Jason Clark said. “Ninety-nine percent of our victims are people who went out drinking. A lot of our streets are really dark, and if they walk home intoxicated, they make a really good victim.”

Follow Us on Facebook!

Related Topics: Bars, Belmont, Chicago Police, Liquor, Liquor Stores, and Tom Tunney

Paul60657

10:47 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Hmmmm. I know of that huge liquor store by the train. They will reapply - and probably get approved so I don't know how this will help, really. BUT the 'Entertainment Detail" - if it is what I think it is - hopefully it will breakup the gangs of Wildebeests roaming Halsted between 2-6AM and bring back sanity to the neighborhood.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Andy Ambrosius

11:04 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

I'll have a full-blown story on the entertainment detail in the next few days that will explain it more. I really think it's going to help.

Comment_arrow

Link N. Parker

3:34 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013

Hi Andy - I am looking forward to reading the more detailed report in the coming days!

Comment_arrow

TJ Williams

5:20 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

Me, too, Andy. Although, since I see Patch is cheerleading the alderman on his FB page, I doubt that your story will be balanced.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Andy Ambrosius

9:30 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

Hey guys - here's the story on the entertainment-area policing increases going into effect this weekend. I think it sounds like a great idea: http://patch.com/A-1lzq

And @Terrence Williams: Sorry you feel that way. Feel free to read the story and decide for yourself. I think it really shows what police are doing, what they haven't done, and what the area problems are. :)

Comment_arrow

Paul60657

9:35 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

I read the story. Its what they were talking about. But from the CPD perspective, I keep hearing this "Dont be a victim" thing. Ummm..first thing that CPD has to do is cleanup Halsted by having all the stoop sitters move along, breakup the roaming gypsies weilding pipes, etc, not letting people walk on the sidewalk, FIRST before spewing 'Dont be a Victim"..... simply way of dont be a victim - dont patronage Halsted - I'm sure all the bars would LOVE is their sales plummeted. But I doublt people would boycott. But it would be cool to see everyone boycott for one Friday Night ... to make a point of how sick and tired we are.

Jen

11:16 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Andy, I'm confused by the "moratorium on new licenses" vs. 6-month grace period for existing businesses. Are license renewals included in the ban on new licenses? In other words, a ban on new licenses would seem to imply that existing businesses could remain, but the paragraph re. a 6-month grace period for existing businesses seems to imply that they will be forced to close or seriously change their business model.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Andy Ambrosius

11:45 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

No, no. Sorry for the confusion. They get a six month grace period to transfer their liquor license to another person if they want, or if they want to sell at this point the new buyer could snag a liquor license without the new rules taking effect. But no NEW liquor licenses will be given out outside the existing businesses. So those people are grandfathered into the area, but if they want to sell in a year to another person, that new person wouldn't be able to get a new liquor license. That's why there's this grace period – to give them time to figure out if they want to sell or transfer ownership, etc.

Comment_arrow

Jen

12:50 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Thanks, that makes sense!

J Moore

11:36 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Will someone explain why there are so many bong shops and yogurt stores in the neighborhood?

Reply

The Truth

12:07 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

That packaged liquor store on the corner near the CTA train station is a hoot. I remember I had to slide my drivers license to enter. There's 36 ways to thwart entry and one I can think of is to bop Courtney over the head, take her i.d. come on in and buy or take whatever you want. They never checked my i.d. at the counter when buying liquor. I just thought this was the wierdest procedure I've ever encountered. In Detroit they have bullet proof glass at the counter. I knew I didn't belong their either.

That Leona's restaurant is above average but I never patronized that corner again.

And yeah, why are there so many bong shops and hookah lounges in an area that loathes cigarette smokers yet I've never smelled so much weed in my entire life 24/7 (including in the common areas of the fancy "condo" I was renting).

This is a start Lakeview. Sounds like you're finally getting your minds right.

Reply

Colin Spence

1:45 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

I personally think that the gang presence in this area has more of an effect on the crime than the liquor stores.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Paul60657

4:14 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

I also agree with Colin, but the problem with area pre-dates Rahm. And the Alderman could care less.

Link N. Parker

2:26 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

I agree with Colin; I do not think that the liquor stores are the root cause.

Someone posted something recently on another website, that summarized a lot of the problems that the area has been having for the past couple of years...basically, a perfect storm was created, that criminals have been taking advantage of. This "storm" was created when Rahm Emmanuel came into office in Spring 2011. Right after being sworn in, Rahm ordered the police to change strategies and deployments. This change essentially was to move police from the "safer" areas of town, to the more high-crime areas. A good idea on paper, but in reality, what happened was the criminals (especially the more career criminals and gang types) who pay attention to this stuff, took notice of this and started to target areas like Lakeview. Why this area? Well look at the "perfect storm" factors:

1. Highly walkable
2. Lots of intoxicated late night partyers
3. Lots of pedestrians with expensive iphones that can be easily pawned
4. A generally "passive", non-violence, dont fight back demeanor to the local residents
5. No conceal carry allowed by those residents
6. A high demand for party drugs (coke, crystal meth etc) by a certain segment of the local populace
6. Quick getaway to the South Side via the Belmont Station

etc etc.

All of these factors helped to contribute to the rise in street crime (muggings, Disturbance of the Peace, etc).

Reply

Link N. Parker

2:29 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

(Cont'd)

Not to mention, the effect that places like the Center on Halsted have. The COH, as a social services center, is needed, but they actively attract teenagers who have serious problems. These kids do need help, but a lot of them bring their dramas and problems with them into the neighborhood, and these problems are being dumped all over us, as residents. Many of these teenagers have behaviors that, in other cities, would put them into a Juvenile Hall Detention center...robbing, mugging, stabbing, public disturbance, even attempted (and comitted) rapes. So, this has been another factor that is affecting the quality of life in the neighborhood to the negative.

Reply

Paul60657

4:11 pm on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

The CCH is nothing more than a baby-sitting facility. The "youths" in there do nothing except lounge and play basketball. None of the rooms seem to be open. All the outlets are covered up so you can't even bring a laptop to use their electricity...and if you aren't vigilant, you're laptop would get stolen as well. But that's my two cents.

Reply

Hank-Henry M. Jung

10:43 am on Thursday, January 17, 2013

This statement is total b.s.; Tunney’s Chief of Staff Bennett Lawson said "the ward’s been discouraging liquor in this area now for 10 years." Yeah right. That's why there is 10-15 NEW bars in the hood where there was an empty vanilla box? Also, how about all the hookers walking around at 5-6am every morning too on that Belmont/Sheffield corner? The cops drive around; then they move to School Street~ Duh!

Reply
Comment_arrow

TJ Williams

5:25 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

^And there you have it. If the CPD cannot/will not handle the issues WE have locally, how can any believe that the west & south side's murder problem will be handled? The inability to handle our relatively simple issues is directly connected to the inability to handle the major issues.

Leave a comment