patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Are Speed Cameras the Way to Lower Taxes? (POLL)

Mayor Mayor Rahm Emanuel's plan thinks so, and he’s banking on the cash to bring in $30 million in fines. Is his plan crazy or genius?

 

Speed cameras are already littered around the North Side, but more might be coming if Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel has his way.

According to the Huffington Post Chicago, speed cameras are a major part of Emanuel’s plan to keep taxes low in 2013. He’s banking on snagging upwards of $30 million next year in fees from the cameras, and fines vary depending on how much of a speed-demon you are.

Fines are slated to start at $35 for drivers caught traveling 6-10 miles over the speed limit, according to NBC Chicago. However, those fines jump to $100 if drivers go 11 miles or more over the limit.

And new cameras are planned for 40 area parks and schools to snag even more speeders, the Huffington Post reports. It’s all a part of Emanuel’s “children first” initiative that will be funded by the new cameras.

Is this the right way of keeping taxes low? Or is this just another stab in the dark to avoid another $298 million budget shortfall in Chicago? Vote in our Patch Poll and elaborate in the comments!

  • Are speed cameras a good way to keep taxes lower in Chicago?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Genius!
        0 (0%)
    • Absolutely not.
        2 (66%)
    • Sure, just don't add more cameras!
        0 (0%)
    • Other (I'll tell you in the comments)
        1 (33%)
    Total votes: 3
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Chicago Budget, Chicago Speed Cameras, Mayor Rahm Emanuel, Speed Cameras, and Taxes

Lee Crandell

10:38 am on Saturday, October 13, 2012

I would rather safety improvements for our streets be paid for by dangerous drivers than by all taxpayers.

Reply

Joel Craig

11:16 am on Saturday, October 13, 2012

It's been shown over and over that speed cams simply don't work and usually barely make enough money to pay for their administration. Drivers just learn their locations and slow down. How about controlling spending instead of finding another way to bleed citizens dry.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Andy Ambrosius

11:17 am on Saturday, October 13, 2012

I'd rather have more cameras at intersections catching folks who run red lights. That drives me crazy!

Russ

4:26 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

I hate the damn things and it is just another reason for people to stay in the suburbs .

Reply

Mary Dougherty

1:22 am on Sunday, October 14, 2012

I have been caught by the cameras and am now not running red lights like I used to.
I think it is a great idea to get people to drive safer. I do worry about the impact on poor people - except many of them are on public transportation

Reply

BraD KocH

5:37 pm on Sunday, October 14, 2012

Whats it matter, This guy is gonna do what he wants

Reply

Leave a comment